Electron Density Phantom

Model 062M

Because CT scans are used to correct for tissue inhomogeneities in radiotherapy treatment planning, it’s important to obtain a precise relationship between CT number (in Hounsfield units) and electron densities. The Model 062M Electron density phantom enables precise correlation of CT data to electron density of various tissues and is manufactured from CIRS tissue equivalent materials.

The Model 062M consists of two nested disks made from Plastic Water ® -LR. They can represent both head and abdomen configurations. Nine different tissue equivalent electron density plugs can be positioned at 17 different locations within the scan field. Included is a water vial plug that can be filled with any fluid. Optional distance marker plugs enable quick assessment of the CT scanner’s distance measurement accuracy.

Physicists performing treatment planning need accurate tools to evaluate CT scan data, correct for inhomogeneities and to document the relationship between CT number and tissue density. To improve the accuracy of your treatment planning, consider the CIRS Model 062 Electron Density Phantom.

The 062M is just one of three configurations available as a part of the Cone Beam CT Electron Density & Image Quality Phantom System.

  • Evaluate CT scan data
  • Correct for inhomogeneities
  • Document relationship between CT number and tissue electron density
  • Simulate indicated tissue within the diagnostic energy range
  • Quick assessment of distance registration

NOTE: This product or an optional accessory of this product requires a CIRS dosimetry cavity code before an order can be placed. Please refer to the Dosimetry Cavity Codes document to identify the CIRS code for the probe you intend to use with this product.

Data Sheet

Electron Density Phantom: Data Sheet


CBCT Electron Density & Image Quality Phantom System: Brochure

Dosimetry Cavity Codes

Cavity Codes for Dosimetry Devices


Publication References

Knöös T, Medin J. A dosimetric intercomparison between the radiation therapy clinics in Sweden. Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Swedish Radiation Safety Authority Research Report number: 2012:22 ISSN: 2000-0456. 2012. View

Beardmore AB, Rosen II, Cheek DA, Fields RS, Hogstrom KR. Evaluation of MVCT images with skin collimation for electron beam treatment planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008; 9(3):2773. View

Mehran Y, Beaulieu L. Metal artifact reduction in helical CT for radiation therapy treatment planning. 2004; 50(4):139-140.

Pemler P, Schneider U, Besserer J. Evaluation of the electron density phantom CIRS Model 62. Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik. 2001; 11(1):25-32. View

Hubbell JH. Photon Mass Attenuation and Energy-Absorption Coefficients from 1 keV to 20 MeV. International Journal Applied Radiation Isotopes. 1982; 33:1269-1290.

Judy PF, Adler GJ. Comparison of equivalent photon energy calibration methods in computed tomography. Medical Physics. 1980; 7:685-691. View

Millner MR, Payne WH, Waggener RG, McDavid WD, et al. Determination of effective energies in CT calibration. Medical Physics. 1978;  5(6):543-545. View

Tsukihara M, Noto Y, Hayakawa T, Saito M. Conversion of the energy-subtracted CT number to electron density based on a single linear relationship: an experimental verification using a clinical dual-source CT scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(9):N135-44. View

Jeong H, Lee SB, Yoo SH, et al. Compensation method for respiratory motion in proton treatment planning for mobile liver cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14(2):4055.

Tu S, Yang P, Hong J, Lo C. Quantitative dosimetric assessment for effect of gold nanoparticles as contrast media on radiotherapy planning. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2013;88:14-20. View

Gleisner KS, Ljungberg M. Patient-specific whole-body attenuation correction maps from a CT system for conjugate-view-based activity quantification: method development and evaluation. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2012;27(10):652-64.

Beltran, C. (January 01, 2012). Image quality of an investigational imaging panel for use with the imaging beam line cone-beam CT. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics / American College of Medical Physics, 13, 1.) View

Annkah JK, Rosenberg I, Hindocha N, et al. Assessment of the dosimetric accuracies of CATPhan 504 and CIRS 062 using kV-CBCT for performing direct calculations. J Med Phys. 2014;39(3):133-41. View

Sheng K, Gou S, Wu J, Qi SX. Denoised and texture enhanced MVCT to improve soft tissue conspicuity. Med Phys. 2014;41(10):101916. View

Gayou O, Miften M. Commissioning and clinical implementation of a mega-voltage cone beam CT system for treatment localization. Med Phys. 2007;34(8):3183-92. View

Men, Kuo, Jian-Rong Dai, Ming-Hui Li, Xin-Yuan Chen, Ke Zhang, Yuan Tian, Peng Huang, and Ying-Jie Xu. “A Method to Improve Electron Density Measurement of Cone-Beam CT Using Dual Energy Technique.”BioMed Research International 2015 (2015): 1-8. View

Higashigaito K, Angst F, Runge VM, Alkadhi H, Donati OF. Metal Artifact Reduction in Pelvic Computed Tomography With Hip Prostheses: Comparison of Virtual Monoenergetic Extrapolations From Dual-Energy Computed Tomography and an Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in a Phantom Study. Invest Radiol. 2015; View

Saito M. Technical Note: Relation between dual-energy subtraction of CT images for electron density calibration and virtual monochromatic imaging. Med Phys. 2015;42(7):4088.

Tu, Shu-Ju, Pei-Ying Yang, and Ching-Jung Lo. “Effect of External Targeted Radiotherapy on Dosimetry Due to Rapid Clearance of Gold Nanoparticles.” Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering (n.d.): n. pag. Web. 1 Oct. 2015. View

Ching-Jung Lo, Pei-Ying Yang, Tsi-Chian Chao, Shu-Ju Tu, Effect of contrast agent administration on consequences of dosimetry and biology in radiotherapy planning, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Volume 784, 1 June 2015, Pages 606-609, ISSN 0168-9002. View

Zhou JJ, Gonzalez A, Lenox MW, et al. Dosimetry of a (90)Y-hydroxide liquid brachytherapy treatment approach to canine osteosarcoma using PET/CT. Appl Radiat Isot. 2015;97:193-200. View

Collins fekete CA, Plamondon M, Martin AG, Vigneault É, Verhaegen F, Beaulieu L. Calcifications in low-dose rate prostate seed brachytherapy treatment: post-planning dosimetry and predictive factors. Radiother Oncol. 2015;114(3):339-44. View

Moores, Matthew T., Anthony N. Pettitt, and Kerrie Mengersen. Scalable Bayesian Inference for the Inverse Temperature of a Hidden Potts Model. N.p.: n.p., 2015. View

Y. Lu et al., “Bridge to real data: Empirical multiple material calibration for learning-based material decomposition,” 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Prague, Czech Republic, 2016, pp. 457-460.
doi: 10.1109/ISBI.2016.7493306. View

Fujii K, Nomura K, Muramatsu Y, Obara S, Akahane K, Kusumoto M. Organ Dose Evaluations Based on Monte Carlo Simulation for CT Examinations Using Tube Current Modulation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2016; View

Garcia-Vazquez, V., E. Marinetto, P. Guerra, et al. “Assessment of Intraoperative 3D Imaging Alternatives for IOERT Dose Estimation.” Elsevier, 23 Aug. 2016. Web. View

Bier B, Berger M, Maier A, et al. Scatter Correction Using a Primary Modulator on a Clinical Angiography C-arm CT System. Med Phys. 2017;

Garcia, L. I.R., J. F.P. Azorin, and J. F. Almansa. “A New Method to Measure Electron Density and Effective Atomic Number Using Dual-energy CT Images.” IOP Publishing, 2015. Web. View

Ramos-Garcia, L. I., J. F. Pérez-Azorin, and J. F. Almansa. “Reply to Comment on ‘A New Method to Measure Electron Density and Effective Atomic Number Using Dual-energy CT Images’.” IOP Publishing, 2016. Web.

Model: 062M Modalities: ,