Multi-Purpose Multi-Tissue Ultrasound Phantom

Model 040GSE
The Standard for Ultrasound Quality Assurance
  • Test the full range of standard diagnostic ultrasound probes (2 MHz to 18 MHz)
  • Dual attenuation design provides challenging testing environment for high sensitivity probes
  • Detachable water wells allow for testing curvilinear and endocavity probes
  • Only general purpose QA phantom on market with elasticity targets
  • Ensure over ten years of reliable use through reinspection and repair services

Includes best in industry four-year warranty

The CIRS Model 040GSE Multi-Purpose, Multi-Tissue Ultrasound Phantom is the most complete solution available for performance and quality assurance testing. Its dual frequency design and detachable water wells allows testing of most transducer shapes – including curvilinear and endocavity – and frequencies. It is also the only QA phantom on the market that provides both elasticity targets and all the standard B-mode imaging test objects.

The phantom is made of CIRS’ proprietary Zerdine® hydrogel polymer, which has been formulated to provide tissue mimicking properties including compatibility with harmonic imaging. To maximize phantom lifetime, this gel is contained in a rugged ABS plastic housing with a Saran-based laminate membrane.

CIRS ultrasound QA phantoms come standard with a robust housing, carry case, 48-month warranty, and user guide.

US Patent #5196343

Key Tests with Model 040GSE
  • Uniformity
  • Depth of Penetration
  • Beam Profile/ Focal Zone/ Lateral Response Width
  • Vertical Distance Measurement
  • Horizontal Distance Measurement
  • Axial and Lateral Resolution
  • Elevational Resolution
  • Contrast Resolution
  • Grayscale Contrast Sensitivity
  • Elasticity Sensitivity
  • Dead Zone Assessment

Data Sheet

Multi-Purpose, Multi-Tissue Ultrasound Phantom: Data Sheet


Publication References

Rizzo G, Capponi A, Pietrolucci ME, Arduini D. Role of Sonographic Automatic Volume Calculation in Measuring Fetal Cardiac Ventricular Volumes Using 4-Dimensional Sonography: Comparison With Virtual Organ Computer-Aided Analysis. J Ultrasound Med. 2010; 29(2):261-270. View

Kim C, Yoon C, Park JH, et al. Evaluation of Ultrasound Synthetic Aperture Imaging using Bi-directional Pixel-based Focusing: Preliminary phantom and in vivo Breast study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013. View

Casper A, Liu D, Ballard J, Ebbini E. Real-time Implementation of a Dual-Mode Ultrasound Array System: In Vivo Results. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013. View

Romero-Laorden D, Martínez-Graullera O, Ibañez A, Ullate LG. Beamforming method based on phase dispersion Fourier analysis for SAFT images. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2012;42:012009-. View

Martín-Arguedas C, Martínez-Graullera O, Romero-Laorden D, Gómez-Ullate L. Method and architecture to accelerate multi-element synthetic aperture imaging. Digital Signal Processing. 2013;23(4):1288-1295. View

Ook Yoon, Chong, Changhan Yoon, Yangmo Yoo, Tai-Kyong Song, and Jin Ho Chang.”Real-time sound speed correction using golden section search to enhance ultrasound imaging quality “, Proc. SPIE 8675, Medical Imaging 2013: Ultrasonic Imaging, Tomography, and Therapy, 86751L (March 29, 2013). View

Romero-Laorden, D., J. Villazón-Terrazas, O. Martínez-Graullera, and A. Ibáñez. “Chapter 9.” Strategies for Hardware Reduction on the Design of Portable Ultrasound Imaging Systems. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 June 2013.View

Saarakkala, S., Waris, P., Waris, V., Tarkiainen, I., Karvanen, E., Aarnio, J., & Koski, J. M. (May 01, 2012). Diagnostic performance of knee ultrasonography for detecting degenerative changes of articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 20, 5, 376-381. View

Wang, Z., Li, S., Jiang, X., Liu, R., & Geng, X. (2014). Design and phantom testing of a bi-frequency co-linear array. 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium. View

Kiss, G., Iversen, D., Standal, O., Rau, J., Torp, H., Lovstakken, L., & Masoy, S. (2014). A visualization tool for improved assessment and follow-up with ultrasound. 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium. View

Song P, Urban MW, Manduca A, Greenleaf JF, Chen S. Coded excitation plane wave imaging for shear wave motion detection. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2015;62(7):1356-72. View

Scorza, Andrea, Giulia Lupi, Salvatore Andrea Sciuto, Fabiano Bini, and Franco Marinozzi. “A Novel Approach to a Phantom Based Method for Maximum Depth of Penetration Measurement in Diagnostic Ultrasound: A Preliminary Study.” 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings(2015): n. pag. Web. View

Amaro, J.; Yiu, B.Y.S.; Falcao, G.; Gomes, M.A.C.; Yu, A.C.H., “Software-based high-level synthesis design of FPGA beamformers for synthetic aperture imaging,” in Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on , vol.62, no.5, pp.862-870, May 2015. View

Ramalli A, Guidi F, Boni E, Tortoli P. A real-time chirp-coded imaging system with tissue attenuation compensation. Ultrasonics. 2015;60:65-75. View

Souza, R. M., A. V. Alvarenga, D. S. Braz, L. I. Petrella, and R. P. Costa-Felix. “Uncertainty Evaluation of Dead Zone of Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment.” IOP Science. IOP Publishing, 02 Aug. 2016. Web. View

Tahvildari AM, Pan L, Kong CS, Desser T. Sonographic-Pathologic Correlation for Punctate Echogenic Reflectors in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: What Are They?. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(8):1645-52. View

Andersen, M., C. Moore, K. Arges, et al. “High-Frame-Rate Deformation Imaging in Two Dimensions Using Continuous Speckle-Feature Tracking.” Elsevier, 29 Aug. 2016. Web. View

Ma, C., Z. Long, D. Lanners, et al. “Protocol for Testing Suitability of Compact US Imaging Systems for Use inside MRI Suites, and Application to One Commercial US System.” IOP Publishing, 2016. Web. View

Hasegawa, H. “Improvement of Penetration of Modified Amplitude and Phase Estimation Beamformer.” Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2016. Web. View

Aliabadi, S., Y. Wang, J. Yu, et al. “Eigenspace-based Beamformer Using Oblique Signal Subspace Projection for Ultrasound Plane-wave Imaging.” BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 2016. Web. View

Van Neer, PLMJ, HJ Vos, and AFW Volker. “Stolt Migration Based Iterative Trace Reconstruction.” IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2016. Web. View

Savoia, A. S., G. Caliano, G. Matrone, et al. “Nonlinear Ultrasound Imaging Experiments Using a CMUT Probe.” IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2016. Web. View

Ramalli, A., A. Dallai, E. Boni, et al. “Multi Transmit Beams for Fast Cardiac Imaging towards Clinical Routine.” IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2016. Web. View

Hyder, S., S. Harput, Z. Alomari, et al. “Improved Shear Wave-front Reconstruction Method by Aligning Imaging Beam Angles with Shear-wave Polarization: Applied for Shear Compounding Application.” University of Leeds, 2016. Web. View

Guo, W., Y. Wang, and J. Yu. “Ultrasound Harmonic Enhanced Imaging Based on the Eigen Decomposition.” American Scientific Publishers, 2016. Web. View

Aliabadi, S., Y. Wang, and J. Yu. “Adaptive Scaled Wiener Postfilter Beamformer for Ultrasound Imaging.” IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2016. Web. View

Rodriguez-Molares, Alfonso, Hans Torp, Boris Lippe, and Lasse Løvstakken. “Sequential CPWC: From Ultrafast to Ultralight.” Medical Imaging 2017: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography, 2017. Web. View

Gong, P., P. Song, and S. Chen. “Ultrafast Synthetic Transmit Aperture Imaging (USTA) Using Hadamard-encoded Virtual Sources with Overlapping Sub-Apertures.” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2017. Web. View

Cournane, S., Fagan, A., & Browne, J. (2012) Review of Ultrasound Elastography Quality Control and Training Test Phantoms. Ultrasound February vol. 20, no. 1-2. doi:10.1258/ult.2012.012e01 View

Long, Zaiyang, et al. “Clinical Acceptance Testing and Scanner Comparison of Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography.” Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 19, no. 3, 2018, pp. 336–342., doi:10.1002/acm2.12310. View

Geng, Chuan, et al. “Study and Analysis of a Remote Robot-Assisted Ultrasound Imaging System.” 2020. View